Totally. Side Note: Now that T.I. is out of prison I might use my NAS, T.I. and DMX set.
I only assume that you aren't a dumbass. :huuh:Am I assuming too much? Apparently so because no matter how much I dumb down my words you still, somehow, cannot understand them.
:hohoho: OMFg. Shit.
Definition of DIATRIBE
1 archaic : a prolonged discourse
2 : a bitter and abusive speech or piece of writing
3: ironic or satirical criticism
I assumed that someone who can use the internet to talk shit should have an acceptable grasp of the English language but I guess I assumed too much yes?
Not really. I examine things scientifically. Scientifically speaking you're a worse than a beast. You're a monster. So I placed you in that classification and moved onto something else. You don't concern me because given the fact I've already written you off as a monster, I know everything about you that I need to know. Nothing about you is kind, beautiful, or intelligent and as such, you are not worthy of investigating further. I don't hate anyone who is intellectually challenged. Human beings are not to be hate. I do not dislike anyone who is intellectually challenged. What I dislike my dear, is when a worm learns how to use human language and acts in a manner unbecoming of a worm. What I dislike my dear, is when people do not recognize their place in society. I dislike you Xiga not because you're a complete buffoon, but simply because you are pretentious. Do I need to define pretentious?
Read above and yes my dear you are loveless. Love and hatred cannot co-exist in the same body lest the mortal will be torn asunder. I dislike you because well, you're a monster. But for me to hate you, I would need to obsess over your demise in someway. You're not worthy of that kind of attention plus, given how incompetent you are you're bound to destroy yourself. You'll probably die by taking a television into the tub with you or lighting up in front of a gas stove.
I'm not asking everyone to be skilled in Olde English, I'm asking everyone to have some basic grasp of linguistics.
I'll concede to that on one level but not both. Apparently you are too stupid to understand even my most basic words. However, that is not because you are intellectually disturbed. You are mentally disturbed yes, for how else could you hate children. However, you cannot be "intellectually disturbed" because the intellect is not a condition. Do I need to explain what that means?
I assumed if I gave you an easy example you would understand it. Boy was I wrong huh. :XD:
My precious child, I merely wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt. Nothing more. Again, you imagine insults where there are none.
You are correct. I did bring accusations. You have no idea had to spell, how to communicate coherently, how to make one sentence IN ENGLISH. You say English is not your first language. Clearly. But don't bitch to me simply because I pointed that out. I know you don't know WTF you're talking about, you know it too. But my dear, to complain to me, label me a villain for pointing that out well, I'm befuddled.
Again, you imagine insults where there are none. I name dropped Nietzsche and Hegel not because I assumed you read them, nor did I assume you were even educated. I dropped their names because you do not understand my words or my thoughts. If however, you took it upon yourself to read their works, my words would become clear. I did not mention them to humiliate you because my god you've done that already. I mentioned them because I wanted you to read what they wrote and then you and I would understand each other.
If you stop hating children I'll meet you half way. K? :shiftyeyes:
Undermine; undercut; alter; while these words do not reflect the sumtotal definition of subvert I trust they are on a level even you can understand.
They grow-up so fast. :awwn:
I only assume that you aren't a dumbass. :huuh:Am I assuming too much? Apparently so because no matter how much I dumb down my words you still, somehow, cannot understand them.
:hohoho: OMFg. Shit.
Definition of DIATRIBE
1 archaic : a prolonged discourse
2 : a bitter and abusive speech or piece of writing
3: ironic or satirical criticism
I assumed that someone who can use the internet to talk shit should have an acceptable grasp of the English language but I guess I assumed too much yes?
Not really. I examine things scientifically. Scientifically speaking you're a worse than a beast. You're a monster. So I placed you in that classification and moved onto something else. You don't concern me because given the fact I've already written you off as a monster, I know everything about you that I need to know. Nothing about you is kind, beautiful, or intelligent and as such, you are not worthy of investigating further. I don't hate anyone who is intellectually challenged. Human beings are not to be hate. I do not dislike anyone who is intellectually challenged. What I dislike my dear, is when a worm learns how to use human language and acts in a manner unbecoming of a worm. What I dislike my dear, is when people do not recognize their place in society. I dislike you Xiga not because you're a complete buffoon, but simply because you are pretentious. Do I need to define pretentious?
Read above and yes my dear you are loveless. Love and hatred cannot co-exist in the same body lest the mortal will be torn asunder. I dislike you because well, you're a monster. But for me to hate you, I would need to obsess over your demise in someway. You're not worthy of that kind of attention plus, given how incompetent you are you're bound to destroy yourself. You'll probably die by taking a television into the tub with you or lighting up in front of a gas stove.
I'm not asking everyone to be skilled in Olde English, I'm asking everyone to have some basic grasp of linguistics.
I'll concede to that on one level but not both. Apparently you are too stupid to understand even my most basic words. However, that is not because you are intellectually disturbed. You are mentally disturbed yes, for how else could you hate children. However, you cannot be "intellectually disturbed" because the intellect is not a condition. Do I need to explain what that means?
I assumed if I gave you an easy example you would understand it. Boy was I wrong huh. :XD:
My precious child, I merely wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt. Nothing more. Again, you imagine insults where there are none.
You are correct. I did bring accusations. You have no idea had to spell, how to communicate coherently, how to make one sentence IN ENGLISH. You say English is not your first language. Clearly. But don't bitch to me simply because I pointed that out. I know you don't know WTF you're talking about, you know it too. But my dear, to complain to me, label me a villain for pointing that out well, I'm befuddled.
Again, you imagine insults where there are none. I name dropped Nietzsche and Hegel not because I assumed you read them, nor did I assume you were even educated. I dropped their names because you do not understand my words or my thoughts. If however, you took it upon yourself to read their works, my words would become clear. I did not mention them to humiliate you because my god you've done that already. I mentioned them because I wanted you to read what they wrote and then you and I would understand each other.
If you stop hating children I'll meet you half way. K? :shiftyeyes:
Undermine; undercut; alter; while these words do not reflect the sumtotal definition of subvert I trust they are on a level even you can understand.
They grow-up so fast. :awwn:
anic:
