Dark Woods Circus AG [GAME OVER]
- Thread starter kero_69
- Start date
- Status
As long as you have 5 tokens to use the Hall of Mirrors, you're safe.
And I don't think anyone should have a minus on that attraction lol
And I don't think anyone should have a minus on that attraction lol
Seen there is a ride that gives you tokens, that you can ride when you have 0 tokens, whats the point of kero just giving us free tokens each day? Doesn't make much sense, which is why I believe that by default (Again, this could be different for special people) that we don't get tokens each day.
So don't just spend them all today with the assumption your getting a refill tomorrow. You should wait one day to check, at the very least.
May I also suggest that the Items you get for some of the prizes may be weapons? Makes sense to me. Then again, Items could be anything, from healing to shields to kills... I have a feeling that someone may start collecting them and trading them for tokens or other Items.. maybe even info.
Too bad I won't try that Lucky Dip; apparently, I am hydrophobic and prone to drowning, lol.
Too bad I won't try that Lucky Dip; apparently, I am hydrophobic and prone to drowning, lol.
He raged out over at MF; made a thread called none of YOUR BUSINESS, posted pics and videos and stuff of verses and characters he liked, called everyone else vermin; cause unknown. Suspected to be anti-aker crusades led by Wolfnagi.
EDIT: he also called everyone 'hypocrites who find joy in the suffering of others'.
EDIT: he also called everyone 'hypocrites who find joy in the suffering of others'.
Yeah, but if we think for a second and he comes around to see a bunch of votes on him, he will just spam a bunch and accept his death.
Fact is, I think this lynch on him is just a waste of our time.
If he is inactive and live - Doesn't hurt us.
If he is dead and good - Hurts us. Even more so since there is a chance that we could be killing a children role, which means supreme victory will be gone.
Lets be honestly, Aker is most likely good and we will only shoot ourselves in the foot by lynching him. Whereas leaving him alive, doesn't hurt us at all.
I have no reason to suspect Aker of being bad, for obvious reasons due to his lack of posting, therefore I'm not lynching him. Thats just how I view it anyway~
Fact is, I think this lynch on him is just a waste of our time.
If he is inactive and live - Doesn't hurt us.
If he is dead and good - Hurts us. Even more so since there is a chance that we could be killing a children role, which means supreme victory will be gone.
Lets be honestly, Aker is most likely good and we will only shoot ourselves in the foot by lynching him. Whereas leaving him alive, doesn't hurt us at all.
I have no reason to suspect Aker of being bad, for obvious reasons due to his lack of posting, therefore I'm not lynching him. Thats just how I view it anyway~
Yeah, in an ideal world that assumption would make sense. But I'll play Devil's Advocate and lets go with the odds: 24/29 (Just assuming 5 since its a typically amount of assassin per 25-30 players) odds Aker is not-evil. Those are piss-poor odds. I'd much rather risk it on someone who I believe is suspicious rather then just someone you guys think (think, not know) will be inactive.
I understand why your lynching him and the fact is, it is a valid reason - Which is why I'm not doing anything besides stating my view right now. However, I think thats just a waste of our lynch, thats all I'm trying to say. All and all, I won't hold it against anyone who follows the lynch.
I understand why your lynching him and the fact is, it is a valid reason - Which is why I'm not doing anything besides stating my view right now. However, I think thats just a waste of our lynch, thats all I'm trying to say. All and all, I won't hold it against anyone who follows the lynch.
As for me voting for crestham, he revealed the most on day one, Idc if its his 2nd time in a row, which actually it'd be his third if i remember right, its his fault for making himself suspicious. If in fact he isn't, then we shall see, as for you noex, you defending him, leads me to believe, just like the ACAG, the circus people know each other, which also leads me to believe your suspicious, defending someone on day one, is not on the to do list for me, just saying, Crestham gets my vote, and it'll stay that way, if you can't tell Noex, you're prolly tomorrow, depending on your reaction to this.
No, actually active posters aren't the only people who can be suspicious on day one. Anyone can be if they make the wrong move.
I vote on suspicions and reasoning, not because some player is inactive (or in this case, possibly inactive) - Thats the GMs job to kill inactives, not mine.
Kero has already said " Inactivity killing will be done if a Player does not vote at least every 3rd day". So we kill someone today that will either become active later or be killed for free.
Seems like a massive waste of time to me, but as I said, I'm not going to hold it against anyone who does it.
I vote on suspicions and reasoning, not because some player is inactive (or in this case, possibly inactive) - Thats the GMs job to kill inactives, not mine.
Kero has already said " Inactivity killing will be done if a Player does not vote at least every 3rd day". So we kill someone today that will either become active later or be killed for free.
Seems like a massive waste of time to me, but as I said, I'm not going to hold it against anyone who does it.
- Status