Mafia AG: The Villagers DT [GG]

[Pimp]

always chasing pink... XD

and advance disclaimer: I'm voting for someone completely random, if I choose you it's nothing personal.

Woo Woo Woo You know it!

honestly i don't think there is going to be much action till day 2

 

[Lily]

Meh, yeah I agree with you Pimp~ :/ Don't have really much to go by from the first day discussion.. not that there is really a discussion going on~ But the Day post might change that later :3

 

[Ellure]

Aaaaah, I see. So I guess "Mafioso" would be like the plain Villager role in a normal Mafia AG?

I'm a little confused about the other roles though, like the Quack and Stalker, where it says "including no one" for the ability? What?

 

[VivaLaDementia]

I read it just to mean that they have the option not to use the ability, however it is possible that it could mean something else. Maybe the daily post will give us some info on it.

 

[Notorious]

Maybe Ellure is pretending not to know about them, cos she has one of the roles herself...?

 

[VivaLaDementia]

Could be, but the description on the front page's wording is very confusing, so I believe that is an understandable statement from a player.

 

[Notorious]

Actually, you're right, that's a valid point. I just re-read it now.

 

[Ellure]

Of course, I must have the role. -__-. Though really, if I knew what it meant, would I really question it in here? I'd have no need to ask, least of all publically. You also have to remember that the AG sides are reversed this time round, from what I believe. I guess the Quacker is like the doctor, and the stalker like the investigator/policeman/sheriff.

I think I get it now, though. The wording just confused me. And 4 hours sleep doesn't help either in my brain processing. XD

 

[Notorious]

I guess you're right, just tryna get my head round a coupla things for now...
I think I understand it now too xD

As for your second point I complete understand cos it's 2.30am here right now!! ><;;

 

[Rum]

Of course, I must have the role. -__-. Though really, if I knew what it meant, would I really question it in here? I'd have no need to ask, least of all publically. You also have to remember that the AG sides are reversed this time round, from what I believe. I guess the Quacker is like the doctor, and the stalker like the investigator/policeman/sheriff.

I think I get it now, though. The wording just confused me. And 4 hours sleep doesn't help either in my brain processing. XD

Off with her head! To the guillotine!

 

[Geoff]

Yo aidan, just between you and me, what's your role? :3

Promise I won't tell anyone else. Swear on my heart. <3

 

[VivaLaDementia]

This guy seems legit, I'd do what he says.
Tell me how it goes, cause I have to go, I've got to send some funds to this nice dude from Nigeria.
Don't worry, its totally not a scam, I mean the guy is a prince after all.

 

[Seraph Lucis Eli]

Ok... Jumping in a bit late here. And yes, I DID read the whole thing, so none of those "What's been going on?" questions from me!

I must say, that RNG'd vote on me would likely kill me... Mind if I ask that to be moved? If not, then dang it! -.-
Noex, you are certainly out for death are you? Huh... Role/Faction reversal is an interesting concept indeed.

 

[noex1337]

Heh? Why? I've been yelled at enough that no vote isn't a vote, so RNG it is. No hard feelings here.

 

[VivaLaDementia]

Yeah, but you do realize you are single handily killing Seraph off right now, right?
Edit: Well a tie between Seraph and Nico. Which I have to say, I'm not too happy about right now.

Does Moi have any reasoning to vote Nico at all?

 

[noex1337]

Who's a better target then?

 

[VivaLaDementia]

Well typically if a general agreement is reached, I can come to accept a Day 1 lynch, however this case you are single handily killing off a player while just calling it a random choice. Thats different to me then an agreed upon lynch.
Thats you going out of your way to kill someone when the rest of us were ok without lynching anyone today. Any reason you feel the need for Seraph to die today?

 

[noex1337]

Nope. But i thought the general consensus is to not waste a lynch. Ehhh, sure. vote's switched.

 

[VivaLaDementia]

Well, the general consensus in the voting thread was to let a Day 1 lynch slide by. I will give you credit, it wasn't really obvious when you voted, but it seems so now.
However, this leads me at a stand still with moi.
Do we put a vote on Moi to "encourage" a switch to no-vote? Do we put 2 votes to even more "encourage" a switch? Or do we keep 2 votes on moi for trying to lynch Nico without a reason - Not even a mention of RNG either (Though, it doesn't make a huge different to me if it was mentioned as a reason, the lack of any reasoning does say something).

 

[Rum]

Nope. But i thought the general consensus is to not waste a lynch. Ehhh, sure. vote's switched.

As I mentioned earlier, reactive is being instituted instead of proactive. At this point, who knows if either or is the best option considering it is day 1. The forthcoming days will let us know though.

[MENTION=1507]Geoff[/MENTION]
Can everybody please close their eyes while I post my role to Geoff?

[MENTION=7]VivaLaDementia[/MENTION]
You got that e-mail as well? When the son of a deposed Nigerian king e-mails you directly, asking for help, you help!