@kaze And how is that?
You and still fail to explain why you put all prostitution on a degenerate pedestal among other services
[MENTION=1240]Arachna[/MENTION] your reply had no claim or argument to reply to. It was basically a copy and paste of feminist arguments.
We are not taking legal definition and yes, by definition of prostitution, it does not necessarily need money involvement.
Is a prostitute giving a blow job for some crack any less of a prostitute giving a blow job for money?
And is a prostitute who has a boyfriend and happily engages in sex with him for pure pleasure, but still makes him pay for it every now for a little extra spending money cause he is a sap like that (of course but still wants and enjoys it herself) down graded from a prostitute to a whore or is she still a prostitute?
I don't get where you are going with these classifications. Prostitution is prostitution, and yes if you want to move it out of the realm of sex, there can be considered other forms of prostitution
You can verify this by asking them if they'd still do what they now do as "work", if they'd just won or inherited a billion dollars. Would any sane person actually continue to work any kind of a job if they just get a billion dollars? Ofcourse not. Even if they do. They would not do something they do not find pleasure in.
There are quite a few who "whore" who are not prostitutes, for they actually love what they do, and would continue to engage in promiscuous sex even without the monetary reward.
And are you saying that a prostitute can't love what they do just because they take money for it? So no human on earth can love their job, because if they did, of course they wouldn't want to make any money off it?
Thats quite a dubious claim there because there are in fact people who still work despite having the money to quit